Recent Posts
- Hikma v. Vanda: Oral Argument Recap
- Teva v. Lilly should not be read as creating a new 112 rule for method of use claims
- Should ANDA filers be using the PTAB to mount early challenges to OB patents?
- Switching to WordPress
- Judge Hughes concurrence highlights post grant review appeal standing issue for pharma cases
Category: Validity–Obviousness
-
Sun Pharm. Indus. v. Eli Lilly & Co., No. 2010-1105 (Fed. Cir. 2010) By a vote of 5-4, the Federal Circuit on Monday denied Eli Lilly's petition for panel rehearing or rehearing en banc from the court's July decision that affirmed the invalidity of Lilly's U.S. Patent No. 5,426,826 for obviousness-type double patenting. Judge Newman was…
-
Sun Pharm. Indus. v. Eli Lilly & Co., No. 2010-1105 (Fed. Cir. 2010) The principle behind the doctrine of double patenting is simple: a person may not obtain two patents on the same invention. The doctrine "is intended to prevent a patentee from obtaining a timewise extension of [a] patent for the same invention or…
