Recent Posts
- Hikma v. Vanda: Oral Argument Recap
- Teva v. Lilly should not be read as creating a new 112 rule for method of use claims
- Should ANDA filers be using the PTAB to mount early challenges to OB patents?
- Switching to WordPress
- Judge Hughes concurrence highlights post grant review appeal standing issue for pharma cases
Category: Paragraph IV Cases
-
Ortho-McNeil Pharm. v. Kali Labs., No. 06-CV-3533 (D.N.J.) In a decision released April 17th, the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey granted summary judgment that certain claims of U.S. Patent No. RE39,221 are invalid as obvious. The '221 patent claims combinations of acetaminophen and tramadol, marketed by Ortho-McNeil (OMI) as Ultracet. Barr…
-
Takeda Pharma. v. Teva Pharms. USA, No. 06-033-SLR (D. Del. 2008) Following a week-long bench trial held last year, the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware released an opinion on March 31st stating that Takeda’s patents on Prevacid (lansoprazole) are valid and that Teva’s ANDA for a generic version of Prevacid capsules infringes one of…
-
Last Monday, the Federal Circuit affirmed a district court decision in McNeil-PPC v. Perrigo, concerning a generic version of Pepcid Complete. The decision was affirmed without an opinion, under Rule 36. Tuesday, AstraZeneca and Ranbaxy announced a settlement of their patent litigation over generic Nexium (esomeprazole), with Astra granting Ranbaxy exclusive rights to sell a…
-
Caraco Pharm. Labs. v. Forest Labs., No. 2007-1404 (Fed. Cir. 2008) In a 2-1 decision, the Federal Circuit held today that an ANDA applicant’s declaratory judgment action for noninfringement meets Article III’s "case or controversy" requirement notwithstanding that the patentee has granted the applicant a covenant not to sue. Today’s decision will likely bring a…
-
Ortho-McNeil v. Mylan, No. 2007-1223 (Fed. Cir. 2008); Ortho-McNeil v. Cobalt, Nos. 2007-1258, -1259 (Fed. Cir. 2008) U.S. Patent No. 4,513,006 is listed in the Orange Book as protecting Topamax (topiramate), Ortho-McNeil’s blockbuster anticonvulsant for the treatment of migraines and epilepsy. Mylan and Cobalt seek to market generic versions of Topamax before the ‘006 patent…
-
Eisai Co. v. Teva Pharms. USA, No. 05-5727 (D.N.J. 2008) Eisai Co., Ltd., the Japanese manufacturer of Aricept (donepezil hydrochloride), has won a preliminary injunction against Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., keeping Teva’s generic version of Aricept off the market for the time being. Aricept, which accounts for $1.6 billion in annual U.S. sales, is reportedly…
-
Proctor & Gamble v. Teva Pharms. USA, No. 04-940 (D. Del. 2008) Late last month, the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware (J. Farnan) upheld the validity of Proctor & Gamble’s U.S. Patent No. 5,583,122, which claims risedronate sodium, the active ingredient in Actonel. Teva had challenged the ‘122 patent in a paragraph…
-
Pfizer v. Teva Pharms. USA, No. 2007-1271 (Fed. Cir. 2008) Pfizer owns three Orange Book-listed patents protecting its blockbuster arthritis drug Celebrex (celecoxib): U.S. Patent Nos. 5,466,823; 5,563,165; and 5,760,068. As we previously reported, last year a district court held that Teva's ANDA infringes all three patents, and enjoined Teva from marketing its generic version…
-
Bayer Schering Pharma AG v. Barr Labs., No. 05-2308 (D.N.J. 2008) On Monday, the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey invalidated Bayer's U.S. Patent No. 6,787,531 on grounds of obviousness, relying heavily on KSR. The '531 patent, claiming pharmaceutical formulations of micronized drospirenone and ethinylestradiol, protects Bayer's Yasmin birth control pill. Barr…
-
The New York Times had another article Thursday on the investigation into the Chinese supply of heparin. Pharmalot had this related post Friday. FTC Commissioner Jon Leibowitz wrote an editorial for the Washington Post Monday on "reverse-payment" settlements (or "pay-for-delay" settlements), and the FTC’s recently filed case against Cephalon, in particular. Dow Jones reported Monday…
